Profile

New User

New to Graphy Publications? Create an account to get started today.

Registered Users

Have an account? Sign in now.

How to Cite | Author Information | Publication History | Funding Information
International Journal of Clinical Research & Trials Volume 2 (2017), Article ID 2:IJCRT-116, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-8007/2017/116
Study Protocol
Alveolar Ridge Preservation as a Way to Reduce the Need for Bone Augmentation: Implementation of a New, Non-invasive Method of Measuring Bone Preservation: Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial and Feasibility Testing Results

Sigmar Schnutenhaus1,3*, Jens Dreyhaupt2, Isabel Doering3, Heike Rudolph1 and Ralph G. Luthardt1

1Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Center of Dentistry, University of Ulm, Germany
2Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, University of Ulm, Germany
3Private practice, Hilzingen, Germany
Dr. Sigmar Schnutenhaus, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Center of Dentistry, University of Ulm, Breiter Wasmen 10 D 78247 Hilzingen, Germany; E-mail: sigmar.schnutenhaus@uniklinik-ulm.de
25 May 2017; 08 July 2017; 10 July 2017
Schnutenhaus S, Doering I, Dreyhaupt J, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG (2017) Alveolar Ridge Preservation as a Way to Reduce the Need for Bone Augmentation: Implementation of a New, Non-invasive Method of Measuring Bone Preservation: Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial and Feasibility Testing Results. Int J Clin Res Trials 2: 116. doi: https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-8007/2017/116
Resorba Medical GmbH (Nürnberg, Germany) and the Camlog Foundation (Basel, Switzerland) (Grant No. CF 41305).
German Clinical Trial Register and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform of the WHO: DRKS00004769 (pre-study) date of registration: 2013/02/28 and DRKS00005978 (main trial) date of registration: 2015/11/09.
© 2017 Schnutenhaus et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

References

  1. Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, Lang NP (2012) A systematic review of postextractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 5:1-21 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Pagni G, Pellegrini G, Giannobile WV, Rasperini G (2012) Postextraction alveolar ridge preservation: biological basis and treatments. Int J Dent 2012: 151030 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Hämmerle CH, Araújo MG, Simion M; Osteology Consensus Group 2011 (2012) Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets.Clin Oral Implants Res. 5: 80-82 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Masaki C, Nakamoto T, Mukaibo T, Kondo Y, Hosokawa R (2015) Strategies for alveolar ridge reconstruction and preservation for implant therapy. J Prosthodont Res 59: 220-228 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Kesmas S, Swasdison S, Yodsanga S, Sessirisombat S, Jansisyanont P (2010) Esthetic alveolar ridge preservation with calcium phosphate and collagen membrane: preliminary report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 110:e24-36 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Jamjoom A, Cohen RE (2015) Grafts for Ridge Preservation. J Funct Biomater 6: 833-848 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barone A, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Calvo Guirado JL, et al. (2008) Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: aclinical and histomorphometric study. J Periodontol 79: 1370-1377 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L, Cardaropoli G (2012) Socket preservation using bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane: arandomized controlled clinical trial with histologic analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 32: 421-430 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Fickl S, Kebschull M, Schupbach P, Zuhr O, Schlagenhauf U, et al. (2011) Bone loss after full-thickness and partial-thickness flap elevation. J Clin Periodontol 38: 157-162 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, Blanchette D, Dawson DV (2014) Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 93: 950-958 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Horowitz R, Holtzclaw D, Rosen PS (2012) A review on alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction. J Evid Based Dent Pract 12: 149- 160 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Mardas N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, MacBeth N, Petrie A, Donos N (2015) Does ridge preservation following tooth extraction improve implant treatmentoutcomes: a systematic review: Group 4: Therapeutic concepts & methods. Clin Oral Implants Res 26: 180-201 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Stappert CF, Stein JM, et al. (2008) Dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge contour after different socket preservation techniques. J Clin Periodontol 35: 906-913 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Chappuis V, Engel O, Reyes M, Shahim K, Nolte LP, et al. (2013) Ridge alterations post-extraction in the esthetic zone: a 3D analysis with CBCT. J Dent Res 92: 195S-201S [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Morjaria KR, Wilson R, Palmer RM (2014) Bone healing after tooth extraction with or without anintervention: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 16: 1-20 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Bolz W, Huerzeler MB, et al., (2008) Hard tissue alterations after socket preservation: an experimental study in the beagledog. Clin Oral Implants Res 19: 1111-1118 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Nam HW, Park JB, Lee JY, Rhee SH, Lee SC, et al. (2011) Enhanced ridge preservation by bone mineral bound with collagen-binding syntheticoligopeptide: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 82: 471-80 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Araujo MG, Lindhe J (2005) Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 32: 212- 218 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Kutkut A, Andreana S, Kim HL, Monaco E (2012) Extraction socket preservation graft before implant placement with calcium sulfatehemihydrate and platelet-rich plasma: a clinical and histomorphometric study in humans. J Periodontol 83: 401-409 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Mardas N, Chadha V, Donos N (2010) Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and asynthetic bone substitute or a bovinederived xenograft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 21: 688-698 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Kim YK, Yun PY, Lee HJ, Ahn JY, Kim SG, et al. (2011) Ridge preservation of the molar extraction socket using collagen sponge and xenogeneic bone grafts. Implant Dent 20: 267-272 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Oghli AA, Steveling H (2010) Ridge preservation following tooth extraction: a comparison between atraumatic extraction and socket seal surgery. Quintessence Int 41: 605-609 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Mardas N, D'Aiuto F, Mezzomo L, Arzoumanidi M, Donos N (2011) Radiographic alveolar bone changes following ridge preservation with two differentbiomaterials. Clin Oral Implants Res 22: 416-423 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Crespi R, Capparè P, Gherlone E (2009) Magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite compared to calciumsulfate in the healing of human extraction sockets: radiographic and histomorphometric evaluation at3 months. J Periodontol 80: 210-218 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Sisti, A., et al., (2012) Clinical evaluation of a ridge augmentation procedure for the severely resorbed alveolar socket: multicenter randomized controlled trial, preliminary results. Clin Oral Implants Res 23: 526-535 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Fiorellini JP, Howell TH, Cochran D, Malmquist J, Lilly LC, et al. (2005) Randomized study evaluating recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2for extraction socket augmentation. J Periodontol 76: 605-613 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Pauwels R, Jacobs R, Singer SR, Mupparapu M (2015) CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 44: 20140238 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Coomes AM, Mealey BL, Huynh-Ba G, Barboza-Arguello C, Moore WS, et al. (2014) Buccal bone formation after flapless extraction: a randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2/absorbable collagen carrier and collagen sponge alone. J Periodontol 85: 525-535 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Jung RE, Philipp A, Annen BM, Signorelli L, Thoma DS, et al. (2013) Radiographic evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after toothextraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 40: 90-98 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG (2001) The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality ofreports of parallel group randomized trials. Lancet 357: 1191-1194 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group (2010) CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reportingparallel group randomised trials. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 1: 100-107 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, et al. (2010) CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 340:c869 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Pauwels R, Cockmartin L, Ivanauskaité D, Urbonienė A, Gavala S, et al. (2014) Estimating cancer risk from dental cone-beam CT exposures based on skin dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 59: 3877-3891 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Leung CC, Palomo L, Griffith R, Hans MG, et al. (2010) Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolarbone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137: S109-S19 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Timock AM, Cook V, McDonald T, Leo MC, Crowe J, et al. (2011) Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140: 734-44 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Araki K, Okano T (2013) The effect of surrounding conditions on pixel value of cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 24: 862-865 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Nagarajappa AK, Dwivedi N, Tiwari R (2015) Artifacts: The downturn of CBCT image. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 5: 440-445 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Kamburoğlu K, Murat S, Kılıç C, Yüksel S, Avsever H, et al. (2014) Accuracy of CBCT images in the assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri implant defects: effect of field of view. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 43: 20130332 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Campos MJ, de Souza TS, Mota Júnior SL, Fraga MR, Vitral RW (2014) Bone mineral density in cone beam computed tomography: Only a few shades of gray. World J Radiol 6: 607-612 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Ibrahim N, Parsa A, Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Aartman IH, et al. (2014) Accuracy of trabecular bone microstructural measurement at planned dental implant sites using cone-beam CT datasets. Clin Oral Implants Res 25: 941-945 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Parsa A, Ibrahim N, Hassan B, Motroni A, van der Stelt P, et al., (2012) Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27: 1438-142 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Spin-Neto R, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A (2013) Impact of voxel size variation on CBCT-based diagnostic outcome in dentistry: a systematic review. J Digit Imaging 26: 813-820 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Steinhäuser-Andresen S, Detterbeck A, Funk C, Krumm M, Kasperl S, et al. (2011) Pilot study on accuracy and dimensional stability of impression materials using industrial CT technology. J Orofac Orthop 72: 111-124 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M, Klokkevold PR, Kenney EB, et al. (2000) Influence of bioactive glass on changes in alveolar process dimensions after exodontia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 90: 581-586 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, et al. (2003) Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 74: 990-999 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Aimetti M, Romano F, Griga FB, Godio L (2009) Clinical and histologic healing of human extraction sockets filled with calcium sulfate. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24: 902-909 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Festa VM, Addabbo F, Laino L, Femiano F, Rullo R (2013) Porcine-derived xenograft combined with a soft cortical membrane versus extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical study in humans. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 15: 707-713 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, Figuero E, Martin C, et al. (2012) Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 5: 22-38 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, Duncan W, Faggion CM, et al. (2015) Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5: CD010176 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Safari, Above IE 9.0 version
Privacy Policy | Copyright & Permissions
Copyright © 2013-2024 Graphy Publications, All Rights Reserved.