Factors Associated with Japanese College Students’Foot Condition by Carried Objects: The Second Report : Table 3

Table 3: Comparision of the number of floting toes, hallux valgus angle, buninette angle, and ground contact area by carried objects.
unpaired t-test

		Mean	SD	"95 % Interval" Confidence		t-value	p-value
				"Lower bound"	"Upper boundl"
floating toes(right)	"( n = 123 ) non - carried objects"	2.6	1.9	0.103	0.504	2.991	0.003
	"carried objects ( n = 123 )"	2.3	1.8
floating toes (left)	"( n = 123 ) non - carried objects"	2.5	1.8	-0.243	0.194	-0.221	0.826
	"carried objects ( n = 123 )"	2.6	1.8
"hallux valgus angle (°)" (right)	"non - carried objects ( n = 123 )"	10.4	5.2	-0.8405	0.6356	-0.275	0.784
	"carried objects ( n = 123 )"	10.5	4.8
hallux valgus angle (°)(left)	"non - carried objects ( n = 123 )"	9.2	4.6	-0.6309	0.3838	-0.482	0.631
	"carried objects ( n = 123 )"	9.3	4.4
buninette angle(°) (right)	"non - carried objects ( n = 123 )"	12.8	4.8	-0.1949	0.9558	1.309	0.193
	"carried objects ( n = 123 )"	12.4	4.9
buninette angle(°) (left)	"( n = 123 ) non - carried objects"	12.8	4.7	-0.6846	0.4212	-0.472	0.638
	"carried objects ( n = 123 )"	12.9	4.8
"ground contact area (%)" (right)	"non - carried objects ( n = 123 )"	59.5	9.4	-0.9976	0.6220	-0.459	0.647
	"carried objects ( n = 123 )"	59.7	9.4
"ground contact area (%)" (left)	"non - carried objects ( n = 123 )"	59.5	9.5	-0.8454	1.1218	0.278	0.781
	"carried objects ( n = 123 )"	59.4	10.0